This past weekend during the Keryx weekend at Newberry Correctional, I encountered a prisoner who gave rise to this post. This man takes his faith quite seriously. He is also a King James Version Only (KJVO) man, referring to “The Authorized
Version” whenever he mentions the Bible, which leads to the issue at hand.
He, as many KJVO advocates are wont to do, maintains that contemporary translations have “deleted” words from the Bible, resulting in heresy. Of course, this man’s starting point as the authoritative source is not the Greek/Hebrew text, but the “1611 King James Bible.” He cited John 4:24 as proof of this matter.
The King James reads:
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
The ESV (which I had in my hand as we talked) reads:
God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.”
Here was his argument (honest):
PREMISE: God is spirit.
PREMISE: Satan is spirit.
CONCLUSION: God is Satan.
He followed up by saying, “See what happens by just removing one word?!?!?”
Well, pointing out the flawed logic was of no use. Just because A is C and B is C, it does not necessarily follow that A is B. In addition, his argument would fall apart if the ESV had left the “a” in the passage, because then we could say:
PREMISE: God is a spirit.
PREMISE: Satan is a spirit.
CONCLUSION: God is Satan.
By the same logic, we could reach the following conclusion:
PREMISE: I am human.
PREMISE: Barack Obama is human.
CONCLUSION: I am Barack Obama.
The flawed logic should be rather clear. Plus, if my friend were as attentive to his KJV as he says he is, he would know the “is” in John 4:24 in the KJV is italicized, which means that it did not appear in the original documents and was added by the translators.
True premises do not always lead to a particular conclusion and my new friend has given us a perfect example.







